A brick wall: Vahylevych’s mistake

    Матеріал з Тустань
    Версія від 10:11, 16 червня 2023, створена Роман Стрехалюк (обговорення | внесок) (Створена сторінка: At the top, the remains of a 2.5 m wide stone wall on a four-meter foundation can be seen under the covering. There used to be a log wall there. In the wall, stones of various sizes were placed on a lime solution with admixtures of burnt clay, coal, and even bones. It was built with a system of elastic arches to evenly distribute the load of the masonry - and this is what misled the first researchers. <gallery mode="packed" heights="250px"> Файл:Яб...)
    (різн.) ← Попередня версія | Поточна версія (різн.) | Новіша версія → (різн.)
    Інші мови:

    At the top, the remains of a 2.5 m wide stone wall on a four-meter foundation can be seen under the covering. There used to be a log wall there. In the wall, stones of various sizes were placed on a lime solution with admixtures of burnt clay, coal, and even bones. It was built with a system of elastic arches to evenly distribute the load of the masonry - and this is what misled the first researchers.

    Ivan Vahylevych, a Ukrainian folklorist and public figure, wrote an article full of romantic descriptions of rocks and legends after visiting Urych in 1843. He mistakenly called the half-ruined wall the gate that supposedly led to the courtyard of the fortress. Later studies proved that this is a typical Romanesque construction of the wall, and the middle of it was knocked out by stones during the fall - this is how the arch, visually similar to a passage, was formed.